Automation (2012)

(Image: http://spark.marketo.com/)

On Sunday, 7 October 2012, at Tunbridge Wells Reference Library I was told that I could not login to the Internet for an unknown reason. Although others could do so, my card details were not accepted by any of the three PCs I tried that day.

I was told that this might be because of my use of a lower-case D when I login, but I have been using lower-case letters for a long time, so this was not the issue.

I logged in to the Library Catalogue to demonstrate that my card still worked to be told that this was likely to be because the library uses two completely separate software systems. Yet, this is as unlikely as it would be a computational waste of time. Having two separate user databases would increase search times, error-rates and duplication, as well as being a direct violation of the very concept of relational databases: The reduction of data-storage redundancy. In any case, I was not told this before logging-on to make my point.

The same problem occurred the following day – Monday, 8 October 2012.

In the end, the real problem here is that whenever you revise the library computer systems, three things happen:

1. The system is harder to use;
2. it is less effective; &/or,
3. the system fails altogether.

Why does this happen?

Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://weirdwhites.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

White Men Playing with Themselves (2012)

(Image: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/)

There is no gene for ethics or morality, so this is just more of the scientific racism one has come to expect from Whites.

There is no proof that genes determine character so this is really a eugenics program to kill-off those one does not approve of. This scientist claims the existence of practical ethics as if there could be such a thing as impractical ethics. Only when ethics is universal can such an idea work, since one could easily - as the Nazis did - conclude that Homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses and Freemasons are unethical and destroy them for not being Aryan enough.

It is important for science to stop dabbling in politics unless it has objective proof of its assertions - which it clearly lacks here.

The ethics one claims to be able to produce children to be better able to fit, need to be not practical - whatever that means - but objective. Human beings have never agreed on this and science has never provided an objective basis for such a determination. Moreover, a moral obligation can never exist because morality is about choice, not duty. To claim that such a thing does exist is to tacitly admit one does not understand ethics and that one does not behave in accordance with any of its tenets – precisely because one does not understand the moral life.

Claims like Better or More Intelligent have no objective meaning unless they are scientifically defined. Politically, they mean Conformist and Being Less Prone to Disagree. Claiming responsible parenting is based on Nazi eugenics is a paradox since it means parenting would become no longer necessary to produce good people, since parenting is then transferred to the test tube.

If it is bad to cause harm, then genetically-engineered people will not defend themselves when they are attacked by non genetically-engineered people. The latter will, therefore, be dead and dead people can be neither better nor worse.

There is little evidence for the existence of a natural lottery since Natural Selection is considered synonymous with the concept of Survival-of-the-Fittest - nature screens out useless mutations already. Rational design is not a natural extension of screening for physical diseases since the latter is proven science while the former is not.

All of this gibberish comes down to the tacit admission that Whites have failed to produce ethical cultures because of their preference for such things as White supremacy, Social Snobbery, Sexism, Erotophobia, Pornography, Divorce, Adultery, Alcoholism, Drug-Addiction, etc. Because White culture is essentially a failed culture, Whites now want to try to make people good by accepting bizarre genetic theories and then pretend that these can be used to create better people in the laboratory. Could Whites have been more abjectly-explicit than this at their failure to be as good (or better) than other cultures - who do not face these problems to the same great extent Whites do? Whites have clearly given-up on themselves as viable human beings and are now determined to destroy themselves with pseudo-science because of centuries of guilt for not being as superior as they think they are.

Her is a scientist without scientific merit who bases his work on possibilities, suggestions and likelihoods, tied to his own ball and chain of squeamishness (yet who claims genetically-engineered people are less likely to cause harm - how is that for squeamishness?) and irrationality. Like one of the human-hating charlatans who claims intelligence can be measured, this is a desperate and despairing attempt to make genetics a hard science - as opposed to a soft one - because it cannot make the same hard-&-fast predictions about existence that, for example, chemistry and physics can.

Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://weirdwhites.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

White Reality (2012)

(Image: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/)

An Angry White Female (AWF) responded to Frank TALKER’s comment regarding this article:

‘The Jefferson Lies,’ David Barton's Controversial Best Seller, Dropped By Publishing House For Factual Errors

Frank TALKER said:

Whites are trying to re-write their history because of the shame and guilt it causes them - they are the ethnic group least proud of its heritage. [HuffPost Comments]

The AWF said:

...[O]ne man twisting history is no reflection on all whites. You would have to count exactly how many whites have deliberately falsified history and prove that every single white person has done so to be telling the truth. It is just reverse racism. [HuffPost Comments]

---

Apart from the fact that Frank TALKER never claimed one White person's behavior reflected badly on all Whites - the claim is nothing more than White paranoia - Whites posit a false standard of proof which they claim is required to be 100%. They only do this with regard to issues that make them look bad - never regarding issues that make them look good. (Notice also her claim that reverse racism exists, despite the complete lack of evidence for this: A claim designed to implicitly deny the existence of Institutional Racism.)

When Whites are accused of being White supremacist, they angrily demand 100% proof. When Whites accuse Blacks of being inferior, Whites never offer proof to the same impossible level. In other words, if Blacks cannot prove all Whites racist, then White culture cannot be Institutionally-Racist. This is as nutty as claiming that Nazi Germany was not Nazi because you cannot prove that all Germans were Nazi; meaning Nazi Germany wasn’t really Nazi at all. Could you get any more White supremacist than that?

There are no historical examples of 100% proof being presented to demonstrate anything. To claim its need is symptomatic of the negative affect of White supremacy on the White intellect: It makes Whites claim the existence of the impossible to compensate for the complete lack of proof for White, genetic superiority.

In criminal law, even Whites only demand proof that is beyond a reasonable doubt - not 100%. In civil law, the White standard is the balance of probabilities - not 100% proof.

In science, scientists come to conclusions based upon available, empirical evidence. They are always forced to acknowledge they do not know all the knowable facts and that, because of this, their conclusions are subject to constant change. By definition, it is impossible to know the full extent of what one does not know - nor what remains to be known - so this will always be the case.

Whites thus demand 100% proof of the existence of White supremacy; knowing full well that no such proof can ever exist. This makes Whites believe that the existence of Institutional Racism can always be denied, while the guilty White conscience can be appeased and placated. At least until the next Black man is killed while being arrested and/or in police custody.

Another benefit of playing the White Race Card is that Whites can then claim that all cultures are racist and that Whites are no better nor worse than anyone else. And that there is such a thing as reverse racism, despite the fact that Whites could never suffer to the same degree as Blacks, given their numerical superiority. All without evidence or (100%) proof, naturally.

Whites have no other history than White supremacy so, to retain the advantages of same, they teach racist lies as fact in a desperate attempt to avoid rebuttal and the open revelation of their lazy dependency on White supremacy to survive.

The corollary of this is that Whites make the study of their own history deliberately dull in order to vainly hide its supremacist essence and the still current relevance of racism to their success in life.

The only reason to fear any truth is because it reveals that one is benefiting from illegal and/or immoral activity. This fear refutes the White fallacy of being self-made men when they can all benefit from the White supremacy they gainsay. Trying to hide ongoing affirmative action for Whites (endemic White racism) is the only way Whites try to evade White guilt and shame for such action. Thus, perversely, Whites worship the very ideology that makes a full human life for them impossible. They have to become schizophrenic to simultaneously deny the existence of White supremacy while desperately trying to maintain its benefits.

The only other reason to hide anything is for the purposes of self-protection and self-defense. But, that does not apply regarding White racism since White supremacists are not under any threat from non-Whites - that Whites can successfully and logically articulate. Thus, the White guilt complex is the only reason Whites falsify their history on a regular basis. And why they claim Blacks must abide by a false definition of proof that White statements are never tested against.

Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://weirdwhites.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.